The British Chambers of Commerce
recently held their Annual General Meeting at which the issue of providing
acceptable proof of origin for non-preferential certificates of origin was
raised. It was apparently stated that the BCC
was aware of the problem faced by exporters where obtaining acceptable proof of
origin from third part suppliers has been a big problem.
It was stated that the accepted forms of proof include:
·
Manufacturer (not
supplier) declarations on the manufacturer’s headed paper.
·
Manufacturer’s
invoice
·
Import
Customs entry stating origin of goods ** (see below)
·
“Photographic
evidence” of origin **
·
“Internet
evidence” **
If the exporter is still unable to
obtain any of the above, they can ask for their “case” to be referred to a CPG
panel, which I understand is known as the Certification
Practitioners Group. This group is made up of senior Chamber members with
wide experience in exporting. They will review the available evidence and rule
accordingly. It is intended to be able to make a definitive ruling within 24-38
hours in most cases.
** My concerns
- The “origin” of goods stated in box 34a on a
Customs entry will have probably been completed by a freight forwarder who
has no idea of the true origin of the goods and is more likely to relate
to the origin of the shipment, not the goods. Not what I’d call definitive
proof.
- Personally I do not understand what kind of
photographic evidence could definitively prove the origin of any products.
- Furthermore I know for a fact that using a
website as proof of origin is inherently flawed as there is nothing to
regulate whatever is stated on websites.
No comments:
Post a Comment